Home/Work/Case study
Travel$25K–$70K / month
Case Nº 03 · Travel · Meta Search

Rapid Market Entry & AI Creative Scoring

CTR from 3.8% to 6.1%. CPA down 34%. 40 creatives tested systematically.

Client
FareScraper
Industry
Travel · Meta Search
Monthly budget
$25K–$70K / month
Focus
Search · Creative Testing
Key result Verified outcome
3.8%→6.1%
CPA down 34% · 40 creatives tested
3.8%→6.1%
CTR
−34%
CPA reduced
40
Unique creatives tested
$25–70K
Monthly budget

CTR climbed from 3.8% to 6.1% in 90 days.

CTR improved from 3.8% to 6.1% — a 60% relative improvement in ad relevance. CPA reduced 34% in the first 90 days. The AI creative scoring system eliminated the human delay in creative decisions, saving approximately 15 hours per week of manual review. The origin-destination restructure alone drove a 28% improvement in Quality Score across the account, directly reducing CPCs.

3%4%5%6%7%6.1%3.8%Wk 0Wk 2Wk 4Wk 6Wk 8Wk 10Wk 12
Blended CTR
Challenge

A new entrant against giants

Launching into meta-search with no Quality Score history, against incumbents with years of optimisation.

Approach

40 creatives + AI scoring

Systematic creative testing across origin-destination demand, with a daily AI scoring system to kill losers fast.

Outcome

6.1% CTR, 34% lower CPA

60% relative CTR lift, CPA down 34%, and Quality Score up 28% across the account.

01 The problem

FareScraper was a new entrant in the travel meta-search market — launching into a space dominated by well-funded incumbents with years of optimisation history, established Quality Scores, and deep brand recognition. The challenge wasn't just performance; it was speed. FareScraper needed to build meaningful traffic volume rapidly without the luxury of a slow testing phase. Initial campaigns lacked the creative depth needed to compete across a wide range of origin-destination search queries, and there was no system to catch underperforming assets before they accumulated wasted spend.

Compressing years of history into weeks.

New accounts launch with 5–10 creatives. We launched with 40 and a system to judge all of them daily.

01

Intent-led campaign structure

Built campaigns around flight-comparison search intent and competitor brand queries, where purchase intent runs highest.

02

40-creative test matrix

Tested 40 distinct creatives across origin-destination segments — high-volume routes, seasonal patterns and niche itineraries.

03

Daily AI creative scoring

A custom system scored every active creative by CTR and CPA, auto-flagging underperformers after 3 days below threshold.

04

Origin-destination restructure

Rebuilt campaigns around O-D patterns rather than broad travel categories, lifting Quality Score 28% and cutting CPCs.

A faster way to find winners.

Click-through rate+60%
Before
3.8%
After
6.1%
Cost per acquisition−34%
Before
Baseline
After
−34%
Creatives in rotation5×
Before
~8
After
40

03 The results

CTR improved from 3.8% to 6.1% — a 60% relative improvement in ad relevance. CPA reduced 34% in the first 90 days. The AI creative scoring system eliminated the human delay in creative decisions, saving approximately 15 hours per week of manual review. The origin-destination restructure alone drove a 28% improvement in Quality Score across the account, directly reducing CPCs.

Ninety days to relevance.

Structure → creative volume → scoring → restructure.

Weeks 1–2

Intent structure

Built acquisition campaigns around comparison and competitor-brand intent.

Weeks 3–4

40 creatives live

Shipped the full creative matrix across origin-destination demand segments.

Weeks 5–7

AI scoring online

Daily creative scoring began auto-flagging underperformers — saving ~15 hours/week of review.

Weeks 8–10

O-D restructure

Reorganised around origin-destination patterns, lifting Quality Score 28%.

Weeks 11–12

6.1% CTR

CTR reached 6.1% and CPA settled 34% lower than launch.

What FareScraper kept.

Documented, portable, and owned by the client not locked inside our account.

  • ✓AI creative-scoring systemDaily CTR/CPA scoring with auto-flagging.
  • ✓40-creative test libraryThe full tested matrix and winners.
  • ✓Origin-destination structureCampaign architecture by O-D pattern.
  • ✓Intent keyword setComparison and competitor-brand targeting.
  • ✓Quality Score playbookHow the 28% QS lift was achieved.
  • ✓Creative scoring thresholdsThe pause rules that kill losers fast.

04 Why it worked

New entrants in travel meta-search are at a structural disadvantage — incumbents have Quality Score history that takes years to build. The AI creative scoring system was the unlock that compressed the testing timeline from months to weeks. 40 creatives across all demand segments gave the algorithm enough variety to find winners fast. Most new accounts launch with 5–10 creatives. We launched with 40 and a system to evaluate all of them daily.

”
Launching with 40 creatives and a system to grade them every day is how we caught up to incumbents in weeks, not years.
FS
Head of Growth
FareScraper
Travel
1.02→2.08
ROAS recovery
FlightSearchDirect · Case Nº 04

ROAS Recovery & AI-Powered Automation

ROAS from 1.02 to 2.08. CPA reduced 41%. 1,800+ negatives built.

Read the case study→

Want results like these?

Book a free 20-minute Revenue Leak Audit. We'll review your campaigns, identify the biggest leak, and write you a plan same week.

  • Free 20-minute call with a senior strategist
  • Written audit summary within 5 business days
  • Clear plan, prioritised by revenue impact
Book a free audit →